<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Format Wars &#8211; Should I Shoot in RAW or JPEG?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sandrophoto.com/2011/06/19/format-wars-should-i-shoot-in-raw-or-jpeg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sandrophoto.com/2011/06/19/format-wars-should-i-shoot-in-raw-or-jpeg/</link>
	<description>Learn Photography With Sandro Dzneladze</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:39:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic</title>
		<link>http://www.sandrophoto.com/2011/06/19/format-wars-should-i-shoot-in-raw-or-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-71214</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 22:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandrophoto.com/?p=1456#comment-71214</guid>
		<description>I shoot in RAW, but used to shoot in RAW + JPG.  Having in-camera generated JPG&#039;s was a quick way to get files to websites for news stories and blogs, but RAW is sort of like film, it takes time to process.  And if someone&#039;s intended use is strictly for web based use (using the more limited sRGB color space), then the benefits of raw are less apparent.

The dynamic range is largely dependent on the camera sensor, more so than the RAW vs. JPG choice.  High end cameras have about 12 to 14 stops of dynamic range, a huge improvement over cameras years ago.  There&#039;s one camera coming to market that boasts 20 stops using some sort of in-camera HDR technique.

For Dynamic Range of mid to high end cameras, see
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Ratings/%28type%29/usecase_landscape</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shoot in RAW, but used to shoot in RAW + JPG.  Having in-camera generated JPG&#8217;s was a quick way to get files to websites for news stories and blogs, but RAW is sort of like film, it takes time to process.  And if someone&#8217;s intended use is strictly for web based use (using the more limited sRGB color space), then the benefits of raw are less apparent.</p>
<p>The dynamic range is largely dependent on the camera sensor, more so than the RAW vs. JPG choice.  High end cameras have about 12 to 14 stops of dynamic range, a huge improvement over cameras years ago.  There&#8217;s one camera coming to market that boasts 20 stops using some sort of in-camera HDR technique.</p>
<p>For Dynamic Range of mid to high end cameras, see<br />
<a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Ratings/%28type%29/usecase_landscape" rel="nofollow">http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Ratings/%28type%29/usecase_landscape</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asep</title>
		<link>http://www.sandrophoto.com/2011/06/19/format-wars-should-i-shoot-in-raw-or-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-47214</link>
		<dc:creator>asep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 08:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandrophoto.com/?p=1456#comment-47214</guid>
		<description>thanks for the very good tutorial. I like the raw file, despite having a very large file size</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the very good tutorial. I like the raw file, despite having a very large file size</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.sandrophoto.com @ 2012-05-21 11:02:26 -->
